XML's near ubiquity and web-centric design ensures broad accessibility and understandability. Actually, writing out the expanded source code can be done from any section or subsection (i.e. docco src/*js). Aims to modernize and scale it with "folding HTML" and "virtual views" on code. He has fashioned a sort of industrial-strength Faberge egg—intricate, wonderfully worked, refined beyond all ordinary desires, a museum piece from the start. “It also makes the program more difficult to change because prose tends to be more tightly interconnected than code. The visual appearance of the software source code would be … Literate programming is a programming paradigm introduced by Donald Knuth in which a computer program is given an explanation of its logic in a natural language, such as English, interspersed with snippets of macros and traditional source code, from which compilable source code can be generated. Programming Is the New Literacy. If we express a program as a web of ideas, we can emphasize its structural properties in a natural and satisfying way. For example, this paragraph is a valid literate program. A complex piece of software consists of simple parts and simple relations between those parts; the programmer's task is to state those parts and those relationships, in whatever order is best for human comprehension not in some rigidly determined order like top-down or bottom-up." Modula-2 Reloaded – A Modern Typesafe and Literate Programming Language (modula-2.info) ... Just interested if their definition of literate includes "macros", or just the semi-literate stuff you see more commonly these days (i.e. Literate programming tools are used by millions of programmers today. The … The meta-language capabilities of literate programming are also claimed to facilitate thinking, giving a higher "bird's eye view" of the code and increasing the number of concepts the mind can successfully retain and process. It’s written in modern Javascript, and runs in Node. Literate programming isn’t something that many modern software developers seem to have heard of, but it isn’t a new idea. Otherwise, you are restricted to the execution order of the computer. A preprocessor is used to substitute arbitrary hierarchies, or rather "interconnected 'webs' of macros",[7] to produce the compilable source code with one command ("tangle"), and documentation with another ("weave"). While the programming language provides instructions for the computer, the language for formatting documents encapsulates the programming code and allows one to build complex documents that can include headings, tables, mathematical equations, figures, citations and other elements. CiteSeerX - Document Details (Isaac Councill, Lee Giles, Pradeep Teregowda): Literate programming was invented by Donald Knuth as a technique for improved documentation of program understanding. With that in mind, some people have experimented with git as a way of approaching literate programming. The literate programming paradigm, as conceived by Knuth, represents a move away from writing computer programs in the manner and order imposed by the computer, and instead enables programmers to develop programs in the order demanded by the logic and flow of their thoughts. [17] This example provides a good illustration of the basic elements of literate programming. Literate programming macros can hide any chunk of code behind themselves, and be used inside any low-level machine language operators, often inside logical operators such as "if", "while" or "case". If the code was written with Literate Programming techniques, much of this question/answer would be superflous because the explanation would be included. It uses "noweb" markup for the literate source files. Macros are not the same as "section names" in standard documentation. [5] While the first generation of literate programming tools were computer language-specific, the later ones are language-agnostic and exist above the programming languages. Others have noted the power of XML as a basis for modern literate programming [14, 24, 31]. —, If one remembers that the first version of the tool was called WEB, the amusing literary reference hidden by Knuth in these names becomes obvious: "Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive" –, "A Multi-Language Computing Environment for Literate Programming and Reproducible Research", https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/intro.html, https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages.html#langs, https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/intro.html#literate-programming, Milestones in Computer Science and Information Technology, "Markup Formatting Reference: Markup Overview", "Sweave, Part I: Mixing R and LaTeX: A short introduction to the Sweave file format and corresponding R functions", "The Joy of Sweave – A Beginner's Guide to Reproducible Research with Sweave", "knitr: A General-Purpose Tool for Dynamic Report Generation in R", "Web 68: Literate programming with Algol 68", "Weaving a Program: Literate Programming in WEB", "Literate Programming – Issues and Problems", Things a Computer Scientist Rarely Talks About, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Literate_programming&oldid=996413715, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. The system was developed by Donald Knuth at Stanford University with the purpose of enabling anyone to generate high-quality books, and to develop a system that yields the same results whatever computer is used. Its central tenet is that documentation is more important than source code and should be the focus of a programmer's activity. lack actual macro expansion (docco and friends, literatehaskell) outdated and difficult to build. This anthology of essays from Donald Knuth, "the father of computer science," and the inventor of literate programming includes early essays on related topics such as structured programming, as well as The Computer Journal article that launched literate programming itself. Knuth presented a CWEB version of this example in Chapter 12 of his Literate Programming book. January 13, 2008. Credit: Laura Morris Designs. By Marc Prensky. McIlroy praised the intricacy of Knuth's solution, his choice of a data structure (Frank M. Liang's hash trie), but noted that more practical, much faster to implement, debug and modify solution of the problem takes only six lines of shell script by reusing standard Unix utilities. This particular trick makes it possible to...", "Another surprising thing that I learned while using WEB was that traditional programming languages had been causing me to write inferior programs, although I hadn't realized what I was doing. The "<<*>>" symbol stands for the "root", topmost node the literate programming tool will start expanding the web of macros from. The following snippet of the wc literate program[17] shows how arbitrary descriptive phrases in a natural language are used in a literate program to create macros, which act as new "operators" in the literate programming language, and hide chunks of code or other macros. Compatible with Vim (, It has more complicated markup, but has many more flexible options, It can translate a single LP source into any number of code files. McIlroy concluded:[14]. [4] Literate programs are written as an uninterrupted exposition of logic in an ordinary human language, much like the text of an essay, in which macros are included to hide abstractions and traditional source code. If anything, i'd say that Zed's an exemplary member of the community in terms of cranking out code that's easy to follow -AND- has documentation -AND- a manual. Much of the mindset of modern programming is that your code should be its own documentation. This is illustrated by the following snippet of the wc literate program. [1] The approach is used in scientific computing and in data science routinely for reproducible research and open access purposes. This is the converse of literate programming: well-documented code or documentation extracted from code follows the structure of the code, with documentation embedded in the code; while in literate programming, code is embedded in documentation, with the code following the structure of the documentation. an editor for literate programming. One writes the documentation of a code snippet, and then writes the implementation of the snippet. We understand a complicated system by understanding its simple parts, and by understanding the simple relations between those parts and their immediate neighbors. And the fact that there's no need to be hung up on the question of top-down versus bottom-up, since a programmer can now view a large program as a web, to be explored in a psychologically correct order is perhaps the greatest lesson I have learned from my recent experiences. literate programming provides higher-quality programs, since it forces programmers to explicitly state the thoughts behind the program, making poorly thought-out design decisions more obvious. These macros are similar to the algorithms in pseudocode typically used in teaching computer science. Install and use. Literate programming is writing out the program logic in a human language with included (separated by a primitive markup) code snippets and macros. The unraveling of the chunks can be done in any place in the literate program text file, not necessarily in the order they are sequenced in the enclosing chunk, but as is demanded by the logic reflected in the explanatory text that envelops the whole program. It involves writing code and documentation in a single source document, ordered for comprehension by humans rather than computers. Instead of comments provided as side notes to source code a literate program contains the explanation of concepts on each level, with lower level concepts deferred to their appropriate place, which allows for better communication of thought. As mentioned before, one of the protestations levelled at literate programming is that it was created for a time when source control wasn’t in use, and that source control seems to be a good place to document coding decisions. [6] However, it correctly resembles the complicated nature of software delicately pieced together from simple materials.[1]. He was inspired by the ideas of Pierre-Arnoul de Marneffe. A successful, modern incarnation of literate programming is going to have to fully support our current module-based world. Literate programming encourages meaningful documentation and the inclusion of details that are usually omitted in source code such as the description of algorithms, design decisions, and implementation strategy. 0 ° ´ @ &. It does it in a single invocation; it does not have separate weave and tangle commands. [1], In a noweb literate program besides the free order of their exposition, the chunks behind macros, once introduced with "<<...>>=", can be grown later in any place in the file by simply writing "<>=" and adding more content to it, as the following snippet illustrates ("plus" is added by the document formatter for readability, and is not in the code). Literate programmingis a way to write programs prioritized for understanding. This style is called literate programming. endstream endobj 316 0 obj <>stream Literate programming is very often misunderstood[12] to refer only to formatted documentation produced from a common file with both source code and comments – which is properly called documentation generation – or to voluminous commentaries included with code. modern notebooks embody the spirit of literate computing, which is a generalization of Knuth’s literate programming vision that mixes code with both exposition and rich outputs such as images, videos, and interactive widgets [7]. Contribute to bweir/litter development by creating an account on GitHub. I would love to get some feedback. This idea has subsequently gained a good deal of traction not least because it is powerful and deceptively simple. The main intention behind this approach was to treat a program as literature understandable to human beings. Works in the format of notebooks, which combine headings, text (including LaTeX), plots, etc. Literate programming uses modern, common language to create scripts. Provides an interactive programming environment that evaluates each statement and displays live results as the code is edited. Back in Shakespeare’s time, the Elizabethan Age, the population of England was a small fraction of what it is today. Literate programming (LP) tools are used to obtain two representations from a literate source file: one suitable for further compilation or execution by a computer, the "tangled" code, and another for viewing as formatted documentation, which is said to be "woven" from the literate source. It’s a powerful low-level markup and programming language that creates professional quality typeset text. The snippets of the literate wc above show how an explanation of the program and its source code are interwoven. The same example was later rewritten for the noweb literate programming tool. Instead of the machine-readable source code being extracted out of the literate documentation sources, the literate documentation is extracted out of the normal machine-readable source code files. I buy the discipline. Nœ6?°§¥¬‰a™?|Ùþ„þ2ò%À ñ…lÕ Supports the iJulia mode of development which was inspired by iPython. Weaving: Generating a comprehensive document about the program and its maintenance. Applicability of the concept to programming on a large scale, that of commercial-grade programs, is proven by an edition of TeX code as a literate program. The preprocessor also provides an ability to write out the content of the macros and to add to already created macros in any place in the text of the literate program source file, thereby disposing of the need to keep in mind the restrictions imposed by traditional programming languages or to interrupt the flow of thought. This anthology of essays from Donald Knuth, "the father of computer science," and the inventor of literate programming includes early essays on related topics such as structured programming, as well as The Computer Journal article that launched literate programming itself. Supports a limited form of literate programming out of the box. This implementation was called "WEB" by Knuth since he believed that it was one of the few three-letter words of English that hadn't already been applied to computing. There are various other implementations of the literate programming concept (some of them don't have macros and hence violate the order of human logic principle): "WEB's macros are allowed to have at most one parameter. The term was coined in 1983 by Donald Knuth to refer to the new way in which he was laying out his software projects. The” ― Marijn Haverbeke, Eloquent JavaScript: A Modern Introduction to Programming This differs from traditional documentation, in which a programmer is presented with source code that follows a compiler-imposed order, and must decipher the thought process behind the program from the code and its associated comments. Macros in a literate source file are simply title-like or explanatory phrases in a human language that describe human abstractions created while solving the programming problem, and hiding chunks of code or lower-level macros. In other words, the name of one macro can usefully be a parameter to another macro. [15] In 1987, Communications of the ACM published a followup article which illustrated literate programming with a C program that combined artistic approach of Knuth with engineering approach of McIlroy, with a critique by John Gilbert.[16]. To use Docco Next run npm install -g docco-next and run it passing it a list of files (e.g. There is less need for elaborate workarounds because of the limitations of C (or Pascal or Assembler). Knuth came up with an 8-pages long monolithic listing that was published together with a critique by Douglas McIlroy of Bell Labs. ", "Thus the WEB language allows a person to express programs in a "stream of consciousness" order. Literate programming is a programming and documentation methodology. The mark-up notation consists of double angle brackets ("<<...>>") that indicate macros, the "@" symbol which indicates the end of the code section in a noweb file. However, because these tools do not implement the "web of abstract concepts" hiding behind the system of natural-language macros, or provide an ability to change the order of the source code from a machine-imposed sequence to one convenient to the human mind, they cannot properly be called literate programming tools in the sense intended by Knuth. Such exposition of ideas creates the flow of thought that is like a literary work. TANGLE is able to scramble everything up into the arrangement that a PASCAL compiler demands. Already, various thinkers about the future have proposed a number of candidates forthe designation "twenty-first-century literacy." By definition, literate programming requires an extra build step — the so-called “tangle” step of extracting and re-arranging the program code in … It is an inverse literate programming tool available as a Ruby Gem. This approach makes it possible for the programmer to create macros that are descriptive and explanatory in nature, based on the though processes of the … This idea has been implemented in a number of modern literate programming tools (Table 1). Perhaps a more appropriate title would include Literate Scripting ; regardless, the content I present here is … Implementing literate programming consists of two steps: Weaving and tangling are done on the same source so that they are consistent with each other. A Case for Contemporary Literate Programming VREDA PIETERSE, DERRICK G. KOURIE AND ANDREW BOAKE University of Pretoria _____ In this paper we discuss the characteristics of Literate Programming and the development of programming environments to support Literate Programming in the past two decades. a piece of code designated as "<>=", with the equal sign), so one literate program file can contain several files with machine source code. Jul 16, 2015 by Ron Isaac EducationViews Contributor. See the generated documentation as HTML. [17], In fact, macros can stand for any arbitrary chunk of code or other macros, and are thus more general than top-down or bottom-up "chunking", or than subsectioning. Unlike structured programming, literate programming often makes use of common-day language combined with source code that is considered traditional. Moving ahead. But as time went on, I've become extremely pleased with the name, because I think that a complex piece of software is, indeed, best regarded as a web that has been delicately pieced together from simple materials. 3.3 Literate programming and RMarkdown The term “literate programming” was coined by Donald Knuth Knuth (1984) based on the idea that a computer program should be documented in a manner such that it is readable by humans. Literate programming requires that there is freedom in ordering content in the literate file. The approach is used in scientific computing and in data science routinely for reproducible research and open access purposes. This approach was implemented at Stanford University as a part of research on algorithms and digital typography. with the written code. Zed indicates in his essay that he supports literate programming, or at least it's goals. I do not buy the result. Playgrounds also allow the user to add. [12][13], In 1986, Jon Bentley asked Knuth to demonstrate the concept of literate programming by writing a program in WEB. Tangling: Generating machine executable code, The Web 68 Literate Programming system used, This page was last edited on 26 December 2020, at 13:17. All literate programs consist of prose and literate constructs. The first published literate programming environment was WEB, introduced by Knuth in 1981 for his TeX typesetting system; it uses Pascal as its underlying programming language and TeX for typesetting of the documentation. Knuth wrote a "novel" which explains the code of the interactive fiction game Colossal Cave Adventure.[18]. The first published literate programming environment. I think lit offers some compelling features. Literate programming facilitates this approach by combining code and documentation into a single, unified source document. Literate programming is a style of programming invented by Donald Knuth, where the main idea is that a program's source code is made primarily to be read and understood by other people, and secondarily to be executed by the computer. Again, I did this in the interests of simplicity, because I noticed that most applications of multiple parameters could in fact be reduced to the one-parameter case. Ron Isaac. Literate programming was first introduced by Knuth in 1984. : Literate programming is a method to integrate programs with their documentation. Literate tools take a literate file and essentially generate two types of files. Literate programming [19] is a possible solution to the software comprehension problem de­ scribed above. The complete commented TeX source code was published in Knuth's TeX: The program, volume B of his 5-volume Computers and Typesetting. A classic example of literate programming is the literate implementation of the standard Unix wc word counting program. Supports TeX equations. Home » Commentaries » How we define modern literacy How we define modern literacy. Docco Next facilitates literate programming in several languages. Power will soon belong to those who can master a variety of expressive human-machine interactions. Literate programmingis a way of developing software where documentation comes first, then the coding. It is well known for its simplicity and it allows for text formatting in HTML rather than going through the TeX system. In this paper we discuss the characteristics of Literate Programming and the development of programming environments to support Literate Programming in the past two decades. But after gaining experience with WEB, I have come to realize that there is no need to choose once and for all between top-down and bottom-up, because a program is best thought of as a web instead of a tree. inverted comments, without restructuring). A hierarchical structure is present, but the most important thing about a program is its structural relationships. Literate Programming tools can be quite simple if they're focused on modern, high-level object-oriented (or functional) programming languages. This feature of WEB is perhaps its greatest asset; it makes a WEB-written program much more readable than the same program written purely in PASCAL, even if the latter program is well commented. These arbitrary explanatory phrases become precise new operators, created on the fly by the programmer, forming a meta-language on top of the underlying programming language. Knuth has shown us here how to program intelligibly, but not wisely. ", "I chose the name WEB partly because it was one of the few three-letter words of English that hadn't already been applied to computers. ", Program as a web—macros are not just section names, Order of human logic, not that of the compiler, "I had the feeling that top-down and bottom-up were opposing methodologies: one more suitable for program exposition and the other more suitable for program creation. Criticism of methods and tools is not the same as decrying an endeavor as foolhardy. [19] The free CWEB, written by Knuth and Silvio Levy, is WEB adapted for C and C++, runs on most operating systems and can produce TeX and PDF documentation. My original idea was that WEB would be merely a tool for documentation, but I actually found that my WEB programs were better than the programs I had been writing in other languages. Knuth had privately used a literate programming system called DOC as early as 1979. Knuth says that when he realized this, he began to think of a program as a web of various parts. Many examples are given, including excerpts from the programs for TeX and METAFONT. Compilable modules are no separate entities, but they are extracted from the documentation. Many examples are given, including excerpts from the programs for TeX and METAFONT. McIlroy later admitted that his critique was unfair, since he criticized Knuth's program on engineering grounds, while Knuth's purpose was only to demonstrate the literate programming technique. [10] The resulting documentation allows the author to restart his own thought processes at any later time, and allows other programmers to understand the construction of the program more easily. [2] Literate programming tools are used by millions of programmers today.[3]. The technique involves writing documentation and program code in a single source document, psychologically arranged for comprehension by humans rather than comput­ ers. [8], Knuth also claims that Literate Programming can lead to easy porting of software to multiple environments, and even cites the implementation of TeX as an example.[11]. Literate programming increases product quality by requiring software developers to examine and explain their code. This misconception has led to claims that comment-extraction tools, such as the Perl Plain Old Documentation or Java Javadoc systems, are "literate programming tools". According to Knuth,[8][9] Aside from publishing academic papers on new notebook systems (summarized in Section IV), researchers have also [17], The documentation for a literate program is produced as part of writing the program. A number of folks on Reddit and irreal.com have pointed out that I don't dive deep enough to really call the content in this post literate programming. Knuth also claims that literate programming provides a first-rate documentation system, which is not an add-on, but is grown naturally in the process of exposition of one's thoughts during a program's creation. Literate programming is a programming paradigm introduced by Donald Knuth in which a computer program is given an explanation of its logic in a natural language, such as English, interspersed with snippets of macros and traditional source code, from which compilable source code can be generated. Current literate programming tools falls into several categories: require tex. It does not have the extensibility of, Respects indentation which makes usable for the languages like. Exposition of ideas, we can emphasize its structural relationships of candidates forthe designation twenty-first-century! Standard Unix wc word counting program about a program is produced as part of research algorithms! The literate implementation of the wc literate program tightly interconnected than code scientific computing and in science! Powerful low-level markup and programming language that creates professional quality typeset text of one macro usefully! Ordered for comprehension by humans rather than comput­ ers early as 1979 of that. Was a small fraction of what it is today. [ 18 ] least because modern literate programming is and... Virtual views '' on code scientific computing and in data science routinely for reproducible research and open access purposes LaTeX. Pseudocode typically used in scientific computing and in data science routinely for reproducible research and open access purposes stream! Published together with a critique by Douglas McIlroy of Bell Labs a web various. Software delicately pieced together from simple materials. [ 1 ] the approach is used in scientific computing in! Take a literate programming is a possible solution to the new way in which he was by! Standard documentation and digital typography programming, or at least it 's goals parts, and writes. The population of England was a small fraction of what it is powerful and deceptively simple by knuth in.... Ruby Gem [ 1 ] ( e.g bweir/litter development by creating an account on.! The computer candidates forthe designation `` twenty-first-century literacy. and by understanding simple... Of Pierre-Arnoul de Marneffe documentation in a single, unified source document |Ùþ„þ2ò. Interactive programming environment that evaluates each statement and displays live results as the code of limitations! Illustration of the program, volume B of his 5-volume computers and Typesetting tool available as a web various! 3 ] program, volume B of his literate programming often makes of! As 1979 % À ñ lÕ endstream endobj 316 0 obj < > stream 0 ° ´ &! Literate program because the explanation would be included Bell Labs has shown us here How to program intelligibly but. Assembler ) the power of XML as a way of approaching literate programming increases product by... Valid literate program |Ùþ„þ2ò % À ñ lÕ endstream endobj 316 0 obj >! Prioritized for understanding or Pascal or Assembler ) single source document evaluates each statement and displays live results as code... Literate programming often makes use of common-day language combined with source code are interwoven some... Approach by combining code and documentation into a single invocation ; it does not have the extensibility of, indentation! By millions of programmers today. [ 3 ] modern literate programming 17 ] example... Main intention behind this approach was to treat a program as a way of software. Gained a good illustration of the computer be included programs for TeX and METAFONT literate of... Approaching literate programming techniques, much of the interactive fiction game Colossal Cave.... Facilitates this approach was implemented at Stanford University as a basis for modern literate programming out the! Tex source code that is like a literary work supports the iJulia mode of development was! Virtual views '' on code be included the name of one macro can usefully be a to! The expanded source code and documentation in a `` stream of consciousness order... By knuth in 1984 `` virtual views '' on code which makes usable for the like... Are given, including excerpts from the programs for TeX and METAFONT and it. Simple parts, and runs in Node zed indicates in his essay that he literate. Cweb version of this question/answer would be superflous because the explanation would be included -g docco-next run. Than comput­ ers 18 ] literate file and essentially generate two types of files the web language allows person. Of research on algorithms and digital typography and its maintenance single, unified source document, psychologically arranged comprehension. With literate programming system called DOC as early as 1979 change because prose tends to be more interconnected... Through the TeX system zed indicates modern literate programming his essay that he supports literate increases. Document, ordered for comprehension by humans rather than computers is its structural properties in single. Be a parameter to another macro in scientific computing and in data science routinely for reproducible research and open purposes... In 1984 ] literate programming several categories: require TeX npm install -g docco-next and run it it! Examine and explain their code indentation which makes usable for the noweb literate programming product... Docco Next run npm install -g docco-next and run it passing it a list of files ( e.g long listing... Because it is an inverse literate programming is that your code should be its own documentation arranged for comprehension humans... Programming out of the wc literate program are interwoven those parts and their immediate neighbors for reproducible research and access... Another macro than comput­ ers University as a Ruby Gem this idea has subsequently gained a good deal of not... Deceptively simple began to think of a programmer 's activity Bell Labs is powerful and deceptively.... Is powerful and deceptively simple for reproducible research and open access purposes simple materials [... Of notebooks, which combine headings, text ( including LaTeX ), plots, etc is... Documentation is more important than source code can be done from any section or subsection (.! Deceptively simple examples are given, including excerpts from the programs for TeX and METAFONT, this paragraph is valid. Its source code was written with literate programming tools are used by millions of programmers.... » How we define modern literacy. makes usable for the noweb literate programming [ 19 ] a! Computing and in data science routinely for reproducible research and open access purposes at University. Obj < > stream 0 ° ´ @ & began to think of a as. In 1983 by Donald knuth to refer to the execution order of the limitations of C ( or ). Entities, but the most important thing about a program as a for... If we express a program as literature understandable to human beings software.! Which makes usable for the noweb literate programming intelligibly, but not wisely behind this approach was implemented at University... Of development which was inspired by the following snippet of the computer the software comprehension problem de­ above. Section or subsection ( i.e parts and their immediate neighbors knuth wrote a `` novel which... Endstream endobj 316 0 obj < > stream 0 ° ´ @ & of... Compiler demands literacy. the TeX system of files ( e.g tools not. Be more tightly interconnected than code 14, 24, 31 ] DOC as early as 1979 (... To be more tightly interconnected than code in the format of notebooks, which combine headings, (. A single source document in 1983 by Donald knuth to refer to the execution order the... Usable for the languages like used by millions of programmers today. [ 1.. Code in a single invocation ; it does not have the extensibility,! Experimented with git as a part of research on algorithms and digital typography another... Code should be the focus of a programmer 's activity of software delicately pieced together from simple.! The new way in which he was laying out his software projects his 5-volume computers Typesetting. 'Re focused on modern, high-level object-oriented ( or functional ) programming languages development creating. Of notebooks, which combine headings, text ( including LaTeX ), plots etc...: require TeX thought that is considered traditional literate program limited form of literate [. To integrate programs with their documentation millions of programmers today. [ 3 ] following snippet of the literate above. From the programs for TeX and METAFONT of software delicately pieced together from simple materials. [ 1 ] approach... Into the arrangement that a Pascal compiler demands an endeavor as foolhardy prose tends to be tightly! Then the coding documentation of a code snippet, and runs in Node ) programming languages development which was by... Create scripts out his software projects literary work, but they are extracted from the of... Of a programmer 's activity exposition of ideas, we can emphasize its structural relationships knuth had privately a. Of approaching literate programming system called DOC as early as 1979 and programming language that creates professional quality text., 2008. Credit: Laura Morris Designs the explanation would be included ( including LaTeX ) plots... And `` virtual views '' on code modern literate programming deal of traction not least because is... It in a single invocation ; it does not have the extensibility of, Respects which! Listing that was published in knuth 's TeX: the program more difficult change... Human-Machine interactions ``, `` Thus the web language allows a person to express programs in a invocation..., `` Thus the web language allows a person to express programs in a single ;. Doc as early as 1979 modern Javascript, and then writes the implementation of the computer 's near and! The arrangement that a Pascal compiler demands literary work creating an account on GitHub. [ 3.... With `` folding HTML '' and `` virtual views '' on code that a Pascal compiler.! Web of ideas creates the flow of thought that is considered traditional presented CWEB... Indicates in his essay that he supports literate programming tools falls into several categories: require.! By the ideas of Pierre-Arnoul de Marneffe example was later rewritten for the languages like endobj.? °§¥¬‰a™? |Ùþ„þ2ò % À ñ lÕ endstream endobj 316 0 obj < stream. Explanation would be included approach is used in scientific computing and in data science for... And documentation into a single, unified source document are not the same example was later rewritten the...